Summarize survey risk for the facility.

CaraDay Demo Facility — Survey Risk Summary

Open survey-risk recommendations: 50 total

• 🔴 Critical: 13
• 🟠 High: 37

Every open recommendation in the queue right now is categorized as survey_risk — there are no other recommendation types competing for attention. That means the entire backlog (50 items across 50 census / 31 active residents) is survey-exposure work.

Context that shapes the risk picture

• Census: 50 (31 active, 9 discharged)
• Payer mix is Medicare-heavy: 27 Medicare + 13 Managed Medicare = 80% Medicare-line residents. Survey scrutiny on PDPM documentation, skilled need, and care planning is correspondingly high.
• Acuity signals from average HIPPS letters:
  • PT M / OT M — mid-to-high function-score therapy categories
  • SLP F — high (acoustic/cognitive/swallowing comorbidities present)
  • Nursing I — Special Care High / Clinically Complex range
  • NTA B — very high comorbidity burden (12+ NTA points typical)
• PT distribution skew: 21 residents at PT‑O and 17 at PT‑K — the highest function-score tiers. Surveyors often probe whether ADL/Section GG documentation supports these levels.

What this likely implies (to verify case-by-case)

• With NTA averaging B and Nursing averaging I, the 13 critical items are most likely tied to comorbidity capture, skilled-service justification, or care-plan/MDS alignment — the same areas that drive both reimbursement integrity and F-tag exposure (F636, F655, F656, F684, F697, F812-adjacent documentation).
• Only 1 resident is sub-benchmark on PT, so therapy intensity itself isn't the systemic risk — documentation is.

Recommended next step

Pull the 13 critical survey-risk residents first so we can triage them by F-tag theme and assign owners. Want me to run that list now (highest-risk residents with open critical recommendations) and group them by likely F-tag driver?